2025 Season ·Rider Profile
♂ Rider Profile · 2025 Season · Data Analysis

matt stirrup

152 segment results · 15 rides · Egan 2025

44%
Field position
top 44% of field
0%
Top-10 rate
0 of 152 segments
46%
When fresh
S01–S02 avg
🎯
Rider Type · Data-Derived
All-Rounder
No obvious weakness. Adapts to gradient and distance without big performance swings.

Over 15 rides and 152 segment results in 2025, matt stirrup averaged in the top 44% of the field, with a +1 percentile points (improves!) from the opening segments to the late-ride segments.
Fatigue Pattern — Field Percentile by Segment Position
Average field percentile per segment slot (lower = better; bar height = how far back)
Opening (S01–S02): top 46% avg  →  Late (S07+): top 45% avg  ·  Swing: +1 percentile points (improves!)
Performance by Segment Type
By Distance
<0.4km (n=66 · 442W avg)
Top 44%
0.4–0.8km (n=53 · 368W avg)
Top 43%
>0.8km (n=33 · 328W avg)
Top 44%
By Gradient
<6% flat (n=28 · 391W avg)
Top 45%
6–10% mod (n=66 · 385W avg)
Top 44%
10–13% steep (n=46 · 396W avg)
Top 43%
>13% wall (n=11 · 395W avg)
Top 44%
Effort Profile
Punchy <0.45km ≥9% (n=44)
Top 44%
Threshold ≥0.7km ≥5% (n=33)
Top 44%
Peak Performances — Best 5 Segments
RankSegmentDistanceGrade
12/67 Stirrup/Saddle to Moon
Top 18% · R11 · S03
0.59 km8.2%
14/68 Loyola with Berkshire sidetrip
Top 21% · R14 · S03
1.29 km5.5%
15/69 RSA bump
Top 22% · R14 · S04
0.3 km7.7%
17/67 H2N: Voss
Top 25% · R14 · S06
0.37 km11.0%
23/90 Alta Tierra
Top 26% · R07 · S05
0.27 km10.0%
Toughest Moments — Worst 5 Segments
RankSegmentDistanceGrade
74/82 Golden Oak - Sausal to top
Top 90% · R09 · S08
1.02 km6.6%
39/55 middle fork from stop sign
Top 71% · R05 · S07
0.25 km15.2%
39/55 Alexis_to_Country_Club_KOM
Top 71% · R05 · S08
0.79 km7.3%
45/64 Oxford Dr (West)
Top 70% · R27 · S08
0.12 km10.7%
38/55 O'Keefe summitage
Top 69% · R05 · S02
0.41 km6.6%
What the Data Suggests
💪
Strengths to Protect
Remarkable consistency — no single segment type is a weakness. Top 45% late in rides vs top 46% early — you warm into efforts rather than fade. That adaptability is rare: most riders have a clear Achilles heel that good routes can exploit. Best gradient: steep (10–13%) at top 43%.
🎯
Development Area
The ceiling: zero top-10 finishes across 152 segments means the absolute power level — not the profile mix — is where gains come from. Best result is top 48% of the field. Targeted VO2max intervals (short, very high intensity) would shift the absolute power ceiling and convert that consistency into podium finishes.
📊
The Real Enemy
Absolute power, not profile. The data shows manageable fatigue. The consistency is the foundation. The gap to the front isn't about endurance or the wrong segment type — it's about the power number itself. That's the most direct lever.