Rider Type · Data-Derived
All-Rounder
No obvious weakness. Adapts to gradient and distance without big performance swings.
Over 11 rides and 121 segment results in 2025, R S averaged in the top 84% of the field, with a −3 percentile points from the opening segments to the late-ride segments.
Over 11 rides and 121 segment results in 2025, R S averaged in the top 84% of the field, with a −3 percentile points from the opening segments to the late-ride segments.
Fatigue Pattern — Field Percentile by Segment Position
Average field percentile per segment slot (lower = better; bar height = how far back)
Opening (S01–S02): top 83% avg →
Late (S07+): top 86% avg ·
Swing: −3 percentile points
Performance by Segment Type
By Distance
<0.4km (n=61)
Top 82%
0.4–0.8km (n=36)
Top 87%
>0.8km (n=24)
Top 85%
By Gradient
<6% flat (n=17)
Top 84%
6–10% mod (n=55)
Top 85%
10–13% steep (n=41)
Top 84%
>13% wall (n=8)
Top 77%
Effort Profile
Punchy <0.45km ≥9% (n=39)
Top 83%
Threshold ≥0.7km ≥5% (n=27)
Top 85%
Peak Performances — Best 5 Segments
| Rank | Segment | Distance | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18/60 | Tanglewood Lane | 0.21 km | 15.8% |
| 48/77 | La Barranca Rd | 0.22 km | 7.7% |
| 34/54 | Dirk's super short hill sprint | 0.18 km | 5.2% |
| 44/69 | Black Mtn Rd. | 0.83 km | 5.6% |
| 37/57 | Palmer Climb | 0.26 km | 14.8% |
Toughest Moments — Worst 5 Segments
| Rank | Segment | Distance | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 71/71 | Almaden Ct. Climb | 0.32 km | 10.0% |
| 67/68 | Aric Lane | 0.23 km | 3.8% |
| 66/67 | Dawson Road Wall | 0.34 km | 12.0% |
| 64/65 | Tanglewood Lane | 0.21 km | 15.8% |
| 51/52 | fulll Whitham Avenue | 0.43 km | 5.4% |
What the Data Suggests
💪
Strengths to Protect
Remarkable consistency — no single segment type is a weakness. Consistent across all segment types with less than 5 percentile points separating any category. That adaptability is rare: most riders have a clear Achilles heel that good routes can exploit. Best gradient: wall-steep (>13%) at top 77%.
🎯
Development Area
The ceiling: zero top-10 finishes across 121 segments means the absolute power level — not the profile mix — is where gains come from. Best result is top 96% of the field. Targeted VO2max intervals (short, very high intensity) would shift the absolute power ceiling and convert that consistency into podium finishes.
📊
The Real Enemy
Absolute power, not profile. The data shows manageable fatigue. The consistency is the foundation. The gap to the front isn't about endurance or the wrong segment type — it's about the power number itself. That's the most direct lever.