Rider Type · Data-Derived
All-Rounder
No obvious weakness. Adapts to gradient and distance without big performance swings.
Over 12 rides and 123 segment results in 2025, Rasmus Pil averaged in the top 92% of the field, with a −3 percentile points from the opening segments to the late-ride segments.
Over 12 rides and 123 segment results in 2025, Rasmus Pil averaged in the top 92% of the field, with a −3 percentile points from the opening segments to the late-ride segments.
Fatigue Pattern — Field Percentile by Segment Position
Average field percentile per segment slot (lower = better; bar height = how far back)
Opening (S01–S02): top 91% avg →
Late (S07+): top 93% avg ·
Swing: −3 percentile points
Performance by Segment Type
By Distance
<0.4km (n=61 · 303W avg)
Top 92%
0.4–0.8km (n=35 · 271W avg)
Top 92%
>0.8km (n=27 · 242W avg)
Top 90%
By Gradient
<6% flat (n=22 · 256W avg)
Top 91%
6–10% mod (n=55 · 276W avg)
Top 91%
10–13% steep (n=34 · 298W avg)
Top 92%
>13% wall (n=10 · 311W avg)
Top 93%
Effort Profile
Punchy <0.45km ≥9% (n=35)
Top 92%
Threshold ≥0.7km ≥5% (n=23)
Top 91%
Peak Performances — Best 5 Segments
| Rank | Segment | Distance | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 57/85 | Boronda View Sprint | 0.6 km | 4.4% |
| 74/109 | Taaffe from Dezahara (Egan Official) | 0.43 km | 8.9% |
| 55/75 | Via Ventana and Briones climb | 0.82 km | 6.8% |
| 45/60 | Deerfield Drive up | 0.24 km | 9.1% |
| 58/77 | Foothills Park Vista Point (Egan Official) | 0.96 km | 7.6% |
Toughest Moments — Worst 5 Segments
| Rank | Segment | Distance | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 79/79 | Foothill Lane (no sign on Elena) | 0.31 km | 8.7% |
| 74/74 | De Bell (Egan official) | 0.31 km | 7.9% |
| 69/69 | Black Mtn Rd. | 0.83 km | 5.6% |
| 67/67 | Dam Delight | 0.45 km | 7.9% |
| 65/65 | Foothills Park Vista Point (Egan Official) | 0.96 km | 7.6% |
What the Data Suggests
💪
Strengths to Protect
Remarkable consistency — no single segment type is a weakness. Consistent across all segment types with less than 5 percentile points separating any category. That adaptability is rare: most riders have a clear Achilles heel that good routes can exploit. Best gradient: flat/rolling (<6%) at top 91%.
🎯
Development Area
The ceiling: zero top-10 finishes across 123 segments means the absolute power level — not the profile mix — is where gains come from. Best result is top 84% of the field. Targeted VO2max intervals (short, very high intensity) would shift the absolute power ceiling and convert that consistency into podium finishes.
📊
The Real Enemy
Absolute power, not profile. The data shows manageable fatigue. The consistency is the foundation. The gap to the front isn't about endurance or the wrong segment type — it's about the power number itself. That's the most direct lever.