Rider Type · Data-Derived
All-Rounder
No obvious weakness. Adapts to gradient and distance without big performance swings.
Over 13 rides and 62 segment results in 2025, Wil Gibb averaged in the top 10% of the field, with a +4 percentile points (improves!) from the opening segments to the late-ride segments.
Over 13 rides and 62 segment results in 2025, Wil Gibb averaged in the top 10% of the field, with a +4 percentile points (improves!) from the opening segments to the late-ride segments.
Fatigue Pattern — Field Percentile by Segment Position
Average field percentile per segment slot (lower = better; bar height = how far back)
Opening (S01–S02): top 14% avg →
Late (S07+): top 10% avg ·
Swing: +4 percentile points (improves!)
Performance by Segment Type
By Distance
<0.4km (n=31 · 599W avg)
Top 12%
0.4–0.8km (n=19 · 503W avg)
Top 10%
>0.8km (n=12 · 408W avg)
Top 8%
By Gradient
<6% flat (n=11 · 546W avg)
Top 10%
6–10% mod (n=21 · 520W avg)
Top 12%
10–13% steep (n=25 · 551W avg)
Top 9%
>13% wall (n=4 · 480W avg)
Top 10%
Effort Profile
Punchy <0.45km ≥9% (n=20)
Top 10%
Threshold ≥0.7km ≥5% (n=9)
Top 8%
Peak Performances — Best 5 Segments
| Rank | Segment | Distance | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4/85 | Stonebrook to Prospect | 0.47 km | 5.5% |
| 4/83 | Blandor to end of Olive Tree | 1.06 km | — |
| 4/73 | Viscaino Rd (East Side) | 0.6 km | 10.8% |
| 4/72 | Arastradero 280 Steep Sprint | 0.42 km | 7.4% |
| 4/71 | Westridge first K (Alpine to Boliver) | 0.99 km | 10.8% |
Toughest Moments — Worst 5 Segments
| Rank | Segment | Distance | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23/67 | Lundy Grind | 0.13 km | 8.0% |
| 12/61 | Border Hill | 0.53 km | 8.3% |
| 11/61 | Quinnhill from Summerhill | 0.35 km | 7.5% |
| 12/67 | Quail Beotch | 0.24 km | 10.6% |
| 11/66 | Regent Dr | 0.18 km | 9.0% |
What the Data Suggests
💪
Strengths to Protect
Remarkable consistency — no single segment type is a weakness. Top 10% late in rides vs top 14% early — you warm into efforts rather than fade. That adaptability is rare: most riders have a clear Achilles heel that good routes can exploit. Best gradient: steep (10–13%) at top 9%.
🎯
Development Area
Sharpening the best segments into consistent top-10 finishes. Currently 89% top-10 rate — the consistency is there, the peak isn't yet. High-intensity work (VO2max, 30/30s) would push best efforts into the front group.
📊
The Real Enemy
Absolute power, not profile. The data shows manageable fatigue. The consistency is the foundation. The gap to the front isn't about endurance or the wrong segment type — it's about the power number itself. That's the most direct lever.